|
Release from Orion (The Return of The Hunter)
|
|
|
Release from Orion (The Return of The Hunter) Edmond H. Wollmann Original draft, 7/4/2008 Critical thinking demands dispassionate and mechanistic observations of objective evidence. Cognitive meaning (Virgo) and emotive meaning (Pisces) are at opposite ends of the dimension we know as perspective. Cognitive meaning conveys information[1], while emotive meaning seeks to evoke feelings[2]. A critical thinker (or just a true believer), therefore, can control others less critical or logical, by their ability to evoke emotional meaning whether it contains any reference to reality or any evidence. The emotions according to the less-than-critical thinking person’s perspective are the evidence. Self delusion may be the result. Religion employs this conceptual framework. Astrology is the macrocosmic study of the solar system cell, against the backdrop of the galactic body. There is evidence that this study has cognitive meaning. To extend the cognitive meaning to emotive meaning is a fallacy called an accident.[3] The reason that humans do such things is because they are not taught that critical thinking is the highest order thinking, but that emotive meaning is sacred. Hence, religious and political leaders use this defective perspective to control populations to believe certain policies. On a Sunday in 1961 in Cleveland Ohio when I was 6 years old, my father had the usual difficulty getting me into a suit before heading off to church. But this day it was excruciating for me as I could not fathom the reasoning behind it and the dread was not going away. After my fathers experiences with this Taurean as an infant trying to put my arms through the sleeves of a piece of clothing I was determined not to inhabit, he paused for quite a few moments when I said forcefully; “I can’t understand why “God” would want me to be so uncomfortable just to wear clothes like this, why does he care what I look like?” The awareness of senseless ritual was deafening, and I was told later that this was when the decision was made not to force religion on the children.
The conceptual mythology of Orion is the drama of how beliefs and control builds monuments, and destroys civilizations. · Derivation: The identification of these three stars as a belt is a very old one. The Arabic names of two of the stars reflect this: Mintaka means 'the belt' and Alnitak means 'the girdle'. (The name of the third star, Alnilam, means 'the string of pearls'.) It has been suggested that the three Belt-stars influenced the placing of the Pyramids at Giza, and it is certainly true that there is a remarkable correspondence of position between the Pyramids and the stars. · http://www.astro.wisc.edu/~dolan/constellations/constellations/Orion.html An Astronomical Bestiary · Perhaps second only to the Big Dipper in Ursa Major, the constellation of Orion is one of the most recognizable patterns of stars in the northern sky. Orion, the hunter, stands by the river Eridanus and is accompanied by his faithful dogs, Canis Major and Canis Minor. Together they hunt various celestial animals, including Lepus, the rabbit, and Taurus, the bull. According to Greek mythology, Orion was in love with Merope, one of the Seven Sisters who form the Pleiades, but Merope would have nothing to do with him. Orion's tragic life ended when he stepped on Scorpius, the scorpion. The gods felt sorry for him, so they put him and his dogs in the sky as constellations. They also put all of the animals he hunted up there near him. Scorpius, however, was placed on the opposite side of the sky so Orion would never be hurt by it again. · See also another version of the Orion myth written by Kevin Grey. This article was contributed by Kevin Grey · Orion, the hunter of Taurus the bull, and Lepus the hare. Followed faithfully by his companions Canis Major, and Canis Minor, he is the dominator of the northern sky. Madly in love with the daughter of King Oenopion of Chios, Metrope, Orion was consistently denied marriage to her. His love for her raged, and while in a drunken stupor, raped Metrope. Oenopion consulted Dionysis, and found revenge. Dionysis casted Orion into a deep sleep, and plagued him with blindness. Upon awakening Orion sought the help of an Oracle. It told him that to gain his sight back, he would need to travel east, and let the rays of the sun strike his eyes. Orion did this, regained his sight, and later lived in Crete, where the goddess of the moon Artemis fell in love with him. Her love for him was so strong, that she failed to light the evening sky with moonlight. Orion's death came about when Apollo challenged Artemis to hit a speck among the waters of the ocean, not knowing that this speck was Orion swimming. Artemis shot a single arrow killing him. In response to her actions, Artemis placed Orion, along with his companions Canis Major, and Canis Minor in the sky, near the seven daughters of Oenopion, the Pleiades. Here they remained as the mightiest hunters of the night sky. The Orion-Theory · In 1994 the book The Orion Mystery by Robert Bauval and Adrian Gilbert caused an uproar in the Egyptological world. There is a striking resemblance: three stars in the middle of the Orion constellation, diagonally but with one star deviating, and three pyramids, also with one deviating from the diagonal. And the relative positions of stars and pyramids match each other perfectly. But the authors found even more similarities which cannot be explained by coincidence: Star brightness and pyramid size: Giza consists of two almost equally tall pyramids and a smaller one which is only 53% of the height of the other two. The belt of Orion consists of two almost similarly bright stars, and one with only 50% of the brightness of the other two. The smallest pyramid is the one which deviates from the diagonal, as does the dimmest star! http://www.eridu.co.uk/Author/egypt/lost.html | http://doernenburg.alien.de/alternativ/orion/ori00_e.php Egypt is our symbol for the Orion extremes. By transit the coming Uranus/Pluto squares will challenge critical thinking and our long held beliefs regarding creation. The first of these is constructed for Washington DC below. Uranus (recognition of choice) in Aries (self definition) will square Pluto (emotive control) in Capricorn (pragmatic physical control and perceived status). Jupiter (philosophical concept) squares Neptune (emotive conveyance) the lines of definition become very permeable. The spiritual conflicts with the material. As indicated in the article Paradigm Shift this collective crisis will be determined by the degree of the transformation of emotive meaning into cognitive meaning. The degree to which we can let go of fairy tales about the creation of the Universe and our place in it and employ our true calling of critical thinkers, will be relative to the degree which we are released from the “Bands of Orion” and our self-created need to be stung by the unforeseen Scorpion, or rise to the occasion of Celestial Hunter. Before all of this, we must meet the "Full Externalization" of the Jupiter/Saturn conjunction of 2000 economic de-structurization as Jupiter opposes Saturn opposed Uranus...To be continued...
"Though the desert sands may parch my throat, sting my skin and blind my sight, still I march with calm resolve, through the darkness of the night. For I know that deep beneath this lifeless land, a mighty river flows, to quench my thirst and bring relief, from the painful path I chose." Kim Carlsberg & Darryl Anka, "Contact Cards", 1996, Bear & Company
10,000 BC The Movie WWU Planetarium - American Indian Starlore
[1] A Concise Introduction to Logic, Language: Meaning and Definition, page 69. [2] Emotions are conceptual reactions to beliefs held. [3] An Accident fallacy is committed when a general rule is applied to a specific case it was not intended to cover. [4] Christopher Hitchens, God is Not Great, Chapter 1, page 4. Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A. |